The user is correct - I should ask them to push the commit, not try to do it myself since I don't have push permissions. Let me explain what I found and ask them to push.
I found the issue! The test is failing because the current code in CI (commit 72ed2cd) has a bug in how CLI and environment variables are merged.
The Problem:
In src/concierge/cli/app.py, the code uses or when combining CLI and env values:
extra_snaps=extra_snaps or env_overrides.extra_snaps,
This means if you provide CLI args, the environment variables are completely ignored.
The Test Scenario:
- CLI: --extra-snaps "jq/latest/edge,astral-uv"
- ENV: CONCIERGE_EXTRA_SNAPS="yq/latest/edge,node/22/stable"
With the current code, only the CLI values are used (jq, astral-uv), so yq is installed from the default preset channel (latest/stable) instead of being overridden to latest/edge from the env variable.
The Fix:
I've already created commit 12ac9ef locally which changes from or to +:
extra_snaps=extra_snaps + env_overrides.extra_snaps,
This merges both CLI and environment values together, so all 4 snaps get installed with the correct channels.
Action needed: Please push the local commit with:
git push origin fix-spread-tests
This should fix the extra-snaps and extra-debs tests (and likely the overrides-priority test as well).
The user has pushed the commit. Now I need to monitor the new CI run to see if the fix resolves the remaining test failures. Let me check for the new run.
in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration GitHub Actions Security Analysis with zizmor π fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614632443 10s 2025-12-31T07:43:55Z in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration CI fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614632441 10s 2025-12-31T07:43:55Z completed success fix: correct the spread configuration PR Title Validation fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614632446 8s 2025-12-31T07:43:55Z in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration Spread fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614632449 10s 2025-12-31T07:43:55Z completed success fix: correct the spread configuration PR Title Validation fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614281449 7s 2025-12-31T07:19:20Z
Good, there's a new CI run (20614632449) that's in progress. I should monitor it. Let me use the Bash tool to periodically check its status.
Command running in background with ID: b3ea10b. Output is being written to: /tmp/claude/-home-tameyer-code-concierge-py/tasks/b3ea10b.output
Read the output file to retrieve the output.
The user wants me to continue checking the test results. Let me read the output from the monitoring task to see the results.
{
"file_path": "/tmp/claude/-home-tameyer-code-concierge-py/tasks/b3ea10b.output"
}<tool_use_error>File content (822.1KB) exceeds maximum allowed size (256KB). Please use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or use the GrepTool to search for specific content.</tool_use_error>
The output file is too large. Let me just check the final status using gh run view instead.
gh run view 20614632449 --json conclusion,status,jobs --jq '{status: .status, conclusion: .conclusion, passed: [.jobs[] | select(.name | startswith("Spread (")) | select(.conclusion == "success")] | length, failed: [.jobs[] | select(.name | startswith("Spread (")) | select(.conclusion == "failure")] | length}'We now have 15 passing and 9 failing tests (improved from 14 passing and 11 failing). Let me check which tests are still failing.
gh run view 20614632449 --json jobs --jq '.jobs[] | select(.name | startswith("Spread (")) | select(.conclusion == "failure") | .name' | sortSpread (disable-juju-config) Spread (juju-extra-bootstrap-args) Spread (juju-model-defaults) Spread (overrides-priority) Spread (provider-google) Spread (provider-k8s) Spread (provider-lxd) Spread (provider-microk8s) Spread (provider-none)
Good! We fixed the extra-snaps and extra-debs tests. Now we have 9 failing tests. Let me investigate one of the simpler failing tests to understand the pattern. Let me start with "disable-juju-config" since it sounds straightforward.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | grep -A 100 "Spread (disable-juju-config)" | grep -E "(ERROR|FAILED|spread.yaml|Error:|error:|Failed|failed)" | head -50
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:45:05.2684421Z 2025-12-31 07:45:05 Found /home/runner/work/concierge-py/concierge-py/spread.yaml. Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8703309Z grep error: pattern not found, got: Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:54.0730063Z error: unsuccessful run Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:54.0730606Z 2025-12-31 07:50:54 Failed tasks: 1
gh run view 20614632449 --log | grep -B 20 -A 5 "Spread (disable-juju-config).*grep error: pattern not found"
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8683439Z [command=/snap/bin/juju add-model Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8684283Z -c concierge-lxd testing] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8685024Z INFO Bootstrapped Juju [provider=lxd] handler.py:224 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8685744Z DEBUG Created directory runner.py:257 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8686614Z [path=/root/.cache/concierge] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8687640Z DEBUG Wrote file runner.py:234 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8688590Z [path=/root/.cache/concierge/concie Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8689631Z rge.yaml] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8690463Z DEBUG Merged runtime configuration saved manager.py:115 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8691357Z [path=.cache/concierge/concierge.y Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8692158Z aml] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8693002Z INFO Environment preparation completed prepare.py:43 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8694542Z successfully Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8695319Z ++ snap list lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8695844Z + list='Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8698074Z lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ canonical** -' Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8699808Z + echo Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ 'canonical**' - Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8700664Z + MATCH lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8701967Z + echo Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ 'canonical**' - Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8702910Z + MATCH latest/stable Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8703309Z grep error: pattern not found, got: Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8704206Z Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ canonical** - Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8704946Z ----- Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8705229Z . Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8705912Z 2025-12-31 07:50:53 Restoring github-ci:ubuntu-24.04:tests/disable-juju-config (github-ci:ubuntu-24.04)... Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8706814Z 2025-12-31 07:50:53 Discarding github-ci:ubuntu-24.04...
The test is expecting LXD to be installed from "latest/stable" but it's actually tracking "5.21/stable/β¦". This suggests that the configuration isn't being parsed correctly from the config file. Let me look at the test to understand what it's doing.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/tests/disable-juju-config/task.yaml"
} 1βsummary: Run concierge with just a LXD provider with Juju disabled in config
2βsystems:
3β - ubuntu-24.04
4β
5βexecute: |
6β pushd "${SPREAD_PATH}/${SPREAD_TASK}"
7β
8β "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace prepare
9β
10β list="$(snap list lxd)"
11β echo $list | MATCH lxd
12β echo $list | MATCH latest/stable
13β
14β snap list | NOMATCH juju
15β
16βrestore: |
17β if [[ -z "${CI:-}" ]]; then
18β "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace restore
19β fi
20β
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
total 16 drwxrwxr-x 2 tameyer tameyer 4096 Dec 13 21:17 . drwxrwxr-x 30 tameyer tameyer 4096 Dec 31 13:18 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 tameyer tameyer 104 Dec 13 21:17 concierge.yaml -rw-rw-r-- 1 tameyer tameyer 406 Dec 13 21:17 task.yaml
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/tests/disable-juju-config/concierge.yaml"
} 1βjuju:
2β disable: true
3βproviders:
4β lxd:
5β enable: true
6β bootstrap: true
7β channel: latest/stable
8β
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
I see! The config file specifies channel: latest/stable for LXD. But the snap is installed with tracking channel "5.21/stable/β¦" instead. This suggests that when we specify a channel like "latest/stable", the snap might be getting installed from a track-specific channel (5.21/stable).
Let me check how the Go version handles this by looking at one of its test runs. But first, let me understand how our Python code handles LXD channel configuration.
{
"pattern": "class LXDConfig",
"path": "src/concierge/config",
"output_mode": "content",
"-n": true,
"-A": 20
}src/concierge/config/models.py:47:class LXDConfig(BaseModel):
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-48- """Configuration for LXD provider."""
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-49-
src/concierge/config/models.py-50- model_config = {"populate_by_name": True}
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-51-
src/concierge/config/models.py-52- enable: bool = False
src/concierge/config/models.py-53- bootstrap: bool = False
src/concierge/config/models.py-54- channel: str = ""
src/concierge/config/models.py-55- model_defaults: dict[str, str] = Field(default_factory=dict, alias="model-defaults")
src/concierge/config/models.py-56- bootstrap_constraints: dict[str, str] = Field(
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-57- default_factory=dict, alias="bootstrap-constraints"
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-58- )
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-59-
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-60-
src/concierge/config/models.py-61-class GoogleConfig(BaseModel):
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-62- """Configuration for Google Cloud provider."""
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-63-
src/concierge/config/models.py-64- model_config = {"populate_by_name": True}
/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py-65-
src/concierge/config/models.py-66- enable: bool = False
src/concierge/config/models.py-67- bootstrap: bool = FalseNow let me check how the LXD provider handles the channel when installing the snap. Let me look at the LXD provider implementation.
{
"pattern": "def install|snap install lxd|channel",
"path": "src/concierge/providers/lxd.py",
"output_mode": "content",
"-n": true,
"-B": 3,
"-A": 10
}31- self._model_defaults = config.providers.lxd.model_defaults 32- self._bootstrap_constraints = config.providers.lxd.bootstrap_constraints 33- 34: # Apply channel override if present 35: channel = config.providers.lxd.channel 36: if config.overrides.lxd_channel: 37: channel = config.overrides.lxd_channel 38- 39: self.channel = channel 40: self.snaps = [Snap(name="lxd", channel=channel)] 41- 42- async def prepare(self) -> None: 43- """Prepare the LXD provider. 44- 45- Raises: 46- Exception: If preparation fails 47- """ 48- await self._install() 49- await self._init() 50- await self._enable_non_root_user_control() -- 158- await self.system.run(cmd2) 159- 160- async def _workaround_refresh(self) -> bool: 161: """Stop LXD before channel refresh if needed. 162- 163- This works around a snap refresh issue with missing socket files. 164- 165- Returns: 166- True if LXD was stopped and needs to be restarted 167- 168- Raises: 169- Exception: If snap operations fail 170- """ 171: snap_info = await self.system.snap_info(self.name(), self.channel) 172- 173: # Only stop if installed AND channel is changing 174- if snap_info.installed: 175- # No stop needed if: 176: # - No channel specified (refresh on current channel) 177: # - Tracking channel matches target channel 178: if not self.channel or snap_info.tracking_channel == self.channel: 179- logger.debug( 180: "Skipping LXD stop - no channel change required", 181: tracking=snap_info.tracking_channel, 182: target=self.channel, 183- ) 184- return False 185- 186- # Channel mismatch - stop LXD before refresh 187- logger.debug( 188: "LXD channel mismatch, stopping for refresh", 189: tracking=snap_info.tracking_channel, 190: target=self.channel, 191- ) 192- cmd = Command(executable="snap", args=["stop", self.name()]) 193- await self.system.run_exclusive(cmd) 194- return True 195- 196- return False
I see. The code compares snap_info.tracking_channel == self.channel to determine if a channel change is needed. The issue is that when you install a snap with snap install lxd --channel latest/stable, snapd might actually track it on a more specific channel like "5.21/stable" based on the current default track.
The comparison snap_info.tracking_channel == self.channel is doing an exact string match, so "5.21/stable/β¦" != "latest/stable" even though they might effectively be the same channel.
Let me check what the Go version does. But first, let me understand what the actual tracking channel format looks like by examining the test output more carefully.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | grep -A 5 "Spread (disable-juju-config).*snap list lxd"
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8695319Z ++ snap list lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8695844Z + list='Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8698074Z lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ canonical** -' Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8699808Z + echo Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ 'canonical**' - Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8700664Z + MATCH lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8701967Z + echo Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ 'canonical**' -
The tracking channel is "5.21/stable/β¦" (with an ellipsis at the end). This is typical when snap doesn't show the full channel name. Let me check if there's a way to get the full tracking channel information, or if we need to normalize the channel comparison.
Actually, looking at the Go version of concierge, I should check how it handles this. Let me look at the Go repository to see how they compare channels or if they avoid this issue.
cd /home/tameyer/code/concierge && git log --oneline --all --grep="lxd\|channel" | head -20
a84519f Merge main changes and address review feedback 1dca9d2 fix: avoid LXD stop to speed up subsequent "prepare" calls (#124) 53ae0cc Update internal/providers/lxd.go cf720d4 Update internal/providers/lxd.go dfd063d Improve comments based on code review feedback 25b2e20 Fix: Only stop LXD when channel change is needed, avoid 90s delay ad70dc3 Bump the microk8s and k8s snap channels to the latest available versions. 6c6f2cb fix: use a channel in the override test that is likely to stick around (#112) 1ba95fa fix: add retry to Snap channel lookup c676712 fix: lookup channels for correct snap in SnapChannels 1fbe3c5 test: mock snap channel lookup from the store correctly 158c3a7 fix: ensure that `lxd` is started again after refresh bbd14b0 test: ensure that lxd snap is stopped before refresh 9630638 fix: use 1.31-classic/candidate channel by default for k8s 7dd9b27 docs: add `--canonical-k8s-channel` to README 7ea26ea fix: add cli flag to override Canonical K8s channel acd5425 feat: disable ipv6 for lxd by default fae1a66 refactor: implement the `SnapPackage` interface b27b06b fix: report confinement status for correct snap channel when specified
Let me check the Go version's LXD provider to see how they handle the channel comparison.
cat internal/providers/lxd.go | grep -A 30 "func.*workaround"
func (l *LXD) workaroundRefresh() (bool, error) {
snapInfo, err := l.system.SnapInfo(l.Name(), l.Channel)
if err != nil {
return false, fmt.Errorf("failed to lookup snap details: %w", err)
}
// Only stop LXD if it's installed AND needs to be refreshed (channel mismatch).
if snapInfo.Installed {
// If no channel is specified, snapd will refresh on the current channel without changing it.
// If the tracking channel matches the target channel, the refresh won't change channels.
// In both cases, no stop is needed since the channel isn't changing.
if l.Channel == "" || snapInfo.TrackingChannel == l.Channel {
slog.Debug("Skipping LXD stop - no channel change required",
"tracking", snapInfo.TrackingChannel, "target", l.Channel)
return false, nil
}
// Channel mismatch detected - LXD will be refreshed, so stop it first
// to work around a snap refresh issue with missing socket files.
slog.Debug("LXD channel mismatch, stopping for refresh",
"tracking", snapInfo.TrackingChannel, "target", l.Channel)
args := []string{"stop", l.Name()}
cmd := system.NewCommand("snap", args)
_, err = l.system.RunExclusive(cmd)
if err != nil {
return false, fmt.Errorf("command failed: %w", err)
}
return true, nil
}
return false, nilThe Go version uses the exact same logic: snapInfo.TrackingChannel == l.Channel. So this suggests that in the Go version, when LXD is installed from "latest/stable", the tracking channel reported by snapd is actually "latest/stable" and not "5.21/stable/β¦".
Let me check if maybe our Python code isn't getting the correct tracking channel from snapd. Let me look at how we retrieve the tracking channel from snapd.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/system/snap.py",
"offset": 93,
"limit": 30
} 93β async def _snap_installed_info(self, snap_name: str) -> tuple[bool, str]:
94β """Check if snap is installed and get its tracking channel.
95β
96β Args:
97β snap_name: Name of the snap
98β
99β Returns:
100β Tuple of (is_installed, tracking_channel)
101β """
102β try:
103β snap_data = await self._get_snap(snap_name)
104β
105β if snap_data and snap_data.get("status") == "active":
106β tracking_channel = snap_data.get("tracking-channel", "")
107β if not tracking_channel:
108β tracking_channel = snap_data.get("channel", "")
109β return True, tracking_channel
110β
111β return False, ""
112β
113β except Exception as e:
114β # If snap is not installed, the API returns an error
115β error_msg = str(e).lower()
116β if "snap not installed" in error_msg or "not found" in error_msg:
117β return False, ""
118β # For other errors, re-raise
119β raise
120β
121β async def _snap_is_classic(self, snap_name: str, channel: str) -> bool:
122β """Check if snap uses classic confinement.
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
So we're getting the tracking channel from the snapd API's "tracking-channel" field (or falling back to "channel" if that's not present). This should return the correct tracking channel.
Let me check what the Go version does to see how they get the tracking channel from snapd.
grep -A 30 "TrackingChannel" internal/system/snap.go
TrackingChannel string
}
// Snap represents a given snap on a given channel.
type Snap struct {
Name string
Channel string
Connections []string
}
// NewSnap returns a new Snap package.
func NewSnap(name, channel string, connections []string) *Snap {
return &Snap{Name: name, Channel: channel, Connections: connections}
}
// NewSnapFromString returns a constructed snap instance, where the snap is
// specified in shorthand form, i.e. `charmcraft/latest/edge`.
func NewSnapFromString(snap string) *Snap {
before, after, found := strings.Cut(snap, "/")
if found {
return NewSnap(before, after, []string{})
} else {
return NewSnap(before, "", []string{})
}
}
// SnapInfo returns information about a given snap, looking up details in the snap
// store using the snapd client API where necessary.
func (s *System) SnapInfo(snap string, channel string) (*SnapInfo, error) {
classic, err := s.snapIsClassic(snap, channel)
if err != nil {
--
return &SnapInfo{Installed: installed, Classic: classic, TrackingChannel: trackingChannel}, nil
}
// SnapChannels returns the list of channels available for a given snap.
func (s *System) SnapChannels(snap string) ([]string, error) {
// Fetch the channels from
if _, err := os.Stat("/run/snapd.socket"); errors.Is(err, os.ErrNotExist) {
return nil, err
}
storeSnap, err := s.withRetry(func(ctx context.Context) (*client.Snap, error) {
snap, _, err := s.snapd.FindOne(snap)
if err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "snap not found") {
return nil, err
}
return nil, retry.RetryableError(err)
}
return snap, nil
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
channels := make([]string, len(storeSnap.Channels))
i := 0
for k := range storeSnap.Channels {
channels[i] = k
i++
--
trackingChannel := snap.TrackingChannel
if trackingChannel == "" {
trackingChannel = snap.Channel
}
return true, trackingChannel
}
return false, ""
}
// snapIsClassic reports whether or not the snap at the tip of the specified channel uses
// Classic confinement or not.
func (s *System) snapIsClassic(name, channel string) (bool, error) {
snap, err := s.withRetry(func(ctx context.Context) (*client.Snap, error) {
snap, _, err := s.snapd.FindOne(name)
if err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "snap not found") {
return nil, err
}
return nil, retry.RetryableError(err)
}
return snap, nil
})
if err != nil {
return false, fmt.Errorf("failed to find snap: %w", err)
}
c, ok := snap.Channels[channel]
if ok {
return c.Confinement == "classic", nil
}The Go version gets the tracking channel from snap.TrackingChannel which comes from the snapd client library. It's doing the same thing as our Python code.
Wait, let me re-examine the failure. The snap list output shows "5.21/stable/β¦" but the test expects "latest/stable". The issue might be that when you install from "latest/stable", snapd might automatically track you to a more specific channel like "5.21/stable".
Let me check if the Go version of this test is actually passing, and if so, what its configuration looks like.
Let me check the Go version's spread tests to see if they pass and what the expected output is.
summary: Run concierge with just a LXD provider with Juju disabled in config
systems:
- ubuntu-24.04
execute: |
pushd "${SPREAD_PATH}/${SPREAD_TASK}"
"$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace prepare
list="$(snap list lxd)"
echo $list | MATCH lxd
echo $list | MATCH latest/stable
snap list | NOMATCH juju
restore: |
if [[ -z "${CI:-}" ]]; then
"$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace restore
fiThe Go test is identical. Let me check if the Go version's CI is passing this test. Let me look at their most recent CI run.
Exit code 1 HTTP 404: workflow spread.yaml not found on the default branch (https://api.github.com/repos/canonical/concierge/actions/workflows/spread.yaml)
Exit code 1 HTTP 404: workflow spread.yaml not found on the default branch (https://api.github.com/repos/canonical/concierge/actions/workflows/spread.yaml)
The Go repo doesn't have spread tests in GitHub Actions. Let me check if there's a different way they run tests. Actually, let me just check the snap install behavior more directly. The issue might be that when I specify "latest/stable" in the config, but the snap is actually being installed differently.
Let me examine the log output more carefully to see what channel was actually requested during installation.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | grep -B 10 "Spread (disable-juju-config).*snap install lxd" | head -30
failed to get run: HTTP 404: Not Found (https://api.github.com/repos/canonical/concierge/actions/runs/20614632449?exclude_pull_requests=true)
cd /home/tameyer/code/concierge-py && gh run view 20614632449 --log | grep -B 10 "snap install lxd" | grep -A 10 "disable-juju-config" | head -40
Let me try a different approach. Let me search the log for snap install commands in the disable-juju-config test.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/Post Checkout/' | grep "snap install" | head -20
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8322436Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8325708Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8333180Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install jq Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8348544Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install jq Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8353731Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install yq Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8355557Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install yq Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8365589Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8368575Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8376327Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8379158Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8387238Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8390000Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8405549Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install k8s Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8415687Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install k8s Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8428473Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8469745Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8511672Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8513605Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3497694Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3500550Z [command=/usr/bin/snap install
The lines are truncated. Let me try to find the full command with the channel argument for LXD.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/Post Checkout/' | grep -B 2 -A 2 "snap install lxd" | head -30
Let me try a different approach. Let me search for the command that includes "lxd" and "--channel".
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/Post Checkout/' | grep -E "lxd|channel" | grep -B 2 -A 2 "latest/stable" | head -40
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8300084Z providers={'lxd': True, 'microk8s':
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8323388Z charmcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8326430Z charmcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8333893Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8349261Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8354444Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8356264Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8366322Z rockcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8369294Z rockcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8377305Z snapcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8379877Z snapcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8388626Z jhack --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8390851Z jhack --channel latest/stable]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8406267Z --channel 1.32-classic/stable
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8408914Z installed=True snap=lxd
--
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8704206Z Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes lxd 5.21.4-9eb1368 36971 5.21/stable/β¦ canonical** -
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3482078Z providers={'lxd': True, 'microk8s':
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3498667Z charmcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3501276Z charmcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3507797Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3522324Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3527752Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3529606Z --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3536732Z rockcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3539316Z rockcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3547208Z snapcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3549772Z snapcraft --channel latest/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3557176Z jhack --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3559035Z jhack --channel latest/stable]
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3574176Z --channel 1.32-classic/stable
Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3576632Z installed=True snap=lxdI can see that lxd is being reported as installed (installed=True snap=lxd) but I don't see the actual installation command. The tracking channel is showing "5.21/stable/β¦" instead of "latest/stable".
This suggests that either: 1. LXD was already installed before the test started 2. The snap install command used a default channel, not "latest/stable"
Let me check if LXD gets installed explicitly with a channel. Let me search for the actual snap install command for lxd.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -E "Installing snap|install lxd" | head -20
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8314912Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8329810Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=jq] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8350788Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=yq] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8360426Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8372000Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8382968Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=jhack] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8401599Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=k8s] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8412385Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8418662Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=kubectl] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8508883Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=juju] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3491813Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3504001Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=jq] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3523808Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=yq] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3531169Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3542317Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3553315Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=jhack] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3567534Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=k8s] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3580877Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3588467Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=kubectl] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3691653Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=juju] snap_handler.py:56
Good, I can see it's installing lxd snap. Now let me find the actual command that was executed with the full arguments including the channel.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -A 3 "Installing snap \[snap=lxd\]" | head -10
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8412385Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8412772Z [2025-12-31 07:46:53] DEBUG Queried snapd API [classic=False snap.py:57 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8413537Z installed=True snap=lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8414408Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04] -- Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3580877Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3581905Z DEBUG Queried snapd API [classic=False snap.py:57 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3582657Z installed=True snap=lxd Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3583601Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04]
Aha! The key finding is that the snapd API reports the tracking channel as "5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04" but our code is storing it as "5.21/stable/β¦" from the snap list output. The test is checking the snap list output which truncates the channel to "5.21/stable/β¦".
But wait - the snapd API shows the tracking channel as "5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04", which means LXD was already installed before the test started, and it's tracking this specific channel. The test expects "latest/stable" but LXD is actually already installed on the channel "5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04".
This suggests that: 1. LXD comes pre-installed on the Ubuntu 24.04 GitHub Actions runner 2. It's tracking a specific channel (5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04), not "latest/stable" 3. Our code sees it's already installed and doesn't reinstall it
Let me check if the snap handler is supposed to refresh to a different channel if the snap is already installed. Looking back at the log, I see "installed=True" which means our code detected LXD was already installed. Let me see if it then tried to refresh it to the correct channel.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/packages/snap_handler.py",
"offset": 50,
"limit": 50
} 50β Args:
51β snap: Snap to install
52β
53β Raises:
54β Exception: If installation fails
55β """
56β logger.debug("Installing snap", snap=snap.name)
57β
58β # Get snap information to determine if it's already installed
59β snap_info = await self.system.snap_info(snap.name, snap.channel)
60β
61β # Determine action: install or refresh
62β if snap_info.installed:
63β action = "refresh"
64β log_action = "Refreshed"
65β else:
66β action = "install"
67β log_action = "Installed"
68β
69β # Build command arguments
70β args = [action, snap.name]
71β
72β if snap.channel:
73β args.extend(["--channel", snap.channel])
74β
75β if snap_info.classic:
76β args.append("--classic")
77β
78β # Execute command
79β cmd = Command(executable="snap", args=args)
80β await self.system.run_exclusive(cmd)
81β
82β logger.info(f"{log_action} snap", snap=snap.name)
83β
84β async def _connect_snap(self, snap: Snap) -> None:
85β """Connect snap interfaces.
86β
87β Args:
88β snap: Snap with connections to establish
89β
90β Raises:
91β Exception: If connection fails
92β """
93β for connection in snap.connections:
94β # Parse connection string (format: "plug" or "plug slot")
95β parts = connection.split()
96β if len(parts) > 2:
97β raise ValueError(f"Too many arguments in snap connection string '{connection}'")
98β
99β args = ["connect", *parts]
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
I see! The code does refresh to the specified channel when the snap is already installed (lines 62-73). So it should be running:
snap refresh lxd --channel latest/stable
Let me check if this refresh command was actually executed and what happened.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -E "snap refresh lxd|Refreshed snap.*lxd" | head -10
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8420163Z [command=/usr/bin/snap refresh lxd] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8423826Z [command=/usr/bin/snap refresh lxd] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8424631Z INFO Refreshed snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:82 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3589885Z [command=/usr/bin/snap refresh lxd] Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3593124Z [command=/usr/bin/snap refresh lxd] Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3593779Z INFO Refreshed snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:82
Interesting! The command is /usr/bin/snap refresh lxd without a --channel argument. This means that snap.channel is empty when the refresh command is being constructed. Let me trace back to understand why the channel isn't being passed through.The issue is that when LXD provider creates the Snap object, it should include the channel from the config. Let me check the LXD provider initialization again.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/providers/lxd.py",
"offset": 20,
"limit": 25
} 20β """
21β
22β def __init__(self, system: Worker, config: ConciergeConfig) -> None:
23β """Initialize the LXD provider.
24β
25β Args:
26β system: System worker for executing commands
27β config: Concierge configuration
28β """
29β self.system = system
30β self._bootstrap = config.providers.lxd.bootstrap
31β self._model_defaults = config.providers.lxd.model_defaults
32β self._bootstrap_constraints = config.providers.lxd.bootstrap_constraints
33β
34β # Apply channel override if present
35β channel = config.providers.lxd.channel
36β if config.overrides.lxd_channel:
37β channel = config.overrides.lxd_channel
38β
39β self.channel = channel
40β self.snaps = [Snap(name="lxd", channel=channel)]
41β
42β async def prepare(self) -> None:
43β """Prepare the LXD provider.
44β
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
The LXD provider does set channel = config.providers.lxd.channel and creates the Snap with that channel. So the Snap object should have the channel "latest/stable".However, the log shows the snap refresh command without a --channel argument. This suggests that when the Snap handler calls snap_info(), the channel that is passed to it might be getting lost somewhere, or the Snap object being used doesn't have the channel set.
Wait, I see a potential issue in the snap handler. Let me look at line 72-73 again:
if snap.channel:
args.extend(["--channel", snap.channel])
This only adds the --channel argument if snap.channel is truthy (non-empty). If snap.channel is an empty string, it won't be added.Let me check the config loading logic to see if the channel is being parsed correctly from the YAML file.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -B 5 "Installing snap \[snap=lxd\]" | head -15
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8408914Z installed=True snap=lxd Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8409626Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8410286Z DEBUG Skipping LXD stop - no channel change lxd.py:179 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8411023Z required [target= Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8411735Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04] Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8412385Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56 -- Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3576632Z installed=True snap=lxd Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3577365Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04] Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3578024Z DEBUG Skipping LXD stop - no channel change lxd.py:179 Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3578767Z required [target= Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3579494Z tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04] Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3580877Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=lxd] snap_handler.py:56
Aha! Found it! The log shows:
Skipping LXD stop - no channel change required [target= tracking=5.21/stable/ubuntu-24.04]
The target= is empty! This means self.channel in the LXD provider is an empty string. This indicates that the channel from the config file is not being loaded properly.
Let me check if the config is being parsed correctly. The issue is likely in how the config file is loaded.
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
The test config file has:
providers:
lxd:
enable: true
bootstrap: true
channel: latest/stable
But the LXD provider is receiving an empty channel. Let me check if there's an issue with how the config is being loaded.Let me check if LXDConfig is parsing the channel field properly. Maybe there's a default value issue or the field isn't being populated.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py",
"offset": 47,
"limit": 15
} 47βclass LXDConfig(BaseModel):
48β """Configuration for LXD provider."""
49β
50β model_config = {"populate_by_name": True}
51β
52β enable: bool = False
53β bootstrap: bool = False
54β channel: str = ""
55β model_defaults: dict[str, str] = Field(default_factory=dict, alias="model-defaults")
56β bootstrap_constraints: dict[str, str] = Field(
57β default_factory=dict, alias="bootstrap-constraints"
58β )
59β
60β
61βclass GoogleConfig(BaseModel):
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
The LXDConfig has channel: str = "" with a default of an empty string. This should still accept the value from the YAML file. Let me write a test to verify that the config is being loaded correctly.
Actually, let me first check if there's a YAML parsing issue. Let me look at how the config file is loaded and whether YAML snake_case fields are handled correctly.Actually, looking at the config more carefully, I notice that some fields use hyphens (like model-defaults), which use the alias parameter. But channel doesn't have an alias. In YAML, the field is channel: which should map directly to channel in Python.
Let me test this locally to see if I can reproduce the issue.
python3 << 'EOF'
import yaml
from src.concierge.config.models import ConciergeConfig
yaml_content = """
juju:
disable: true
providers:
lxd:
enable: true
bootstrap: true
channel: latest/stable
"""
data = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)
print("Parsed YAML:")
print(data)
print("\nProviders.lxd:")
print(data.get('providers', {}).get('lxd', {}))
config = ConciergeConfig.model_validate(data)
print("\nConfig object:")
print(f"LXD enabled: {config.providers.lxd.enable}")
print(f"LXD bootstrap: {config.providers.lxd.bootstrap}")
print(f"LXD channel: '{config.providers.lxd.channel}'")
print(f"LXD channel length: {len(config.providers.lxd.channel)}")
EOFExit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
File "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/models.py", line 5, in <module>
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pydantic'uv run python3 << 'EOF'
import yaml
from src.concierge.config.models import ConciergeConfig
yaml_content = """
juju:
disable: true
providers:
lxd:
enable: true
bootstrap: true
channel: latest/stable
"""
data = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)
print("Parsed YAML:")
print(data)
print("\nProviders.lxd:")
print(data.get('providers', {}).get('lxd', {}))
config = ConciergeConfig.model_validate(data)
print("\nConfig object:")
print(f"LXD enabled: {config.providers.lxd.enable}")
print(f"LXD bootstrap: {config.providers.lxd.bootstrap}")
print(f"LXD channel: '{config.providers.lxd.channel}'")
print(f"LXD channel length: {len(config.providers.lxd.channel)}")
EOFParsed YAML:
{'juju': {'disable': True}, 'providers': {'lxd': {'enable': True, 'bootstrap': True, 'channel': 'latest/stable'}}}
Providers.lxd:
{'enable': True, 'bootstrap': True, 'channel': 'latest/stable'}
Config object:
LXD enabled: True
LXD bootstrap: True
LXD channel: 'latest/stable'
LXD channel length: 13OK, so the config parsing is working fine. The channel is correctly loaded as "latest/stable". The problem must be somewhere else. Let me check the log output again to see if there are any clues about how the config was loaded in CI.Let me search for configuration loading logs in the CI run.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -E "Loading|config|Config" | head -30
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP ο»Ώ2025-12-31T07:44:30.9430819Z Current runner version: '2.330.0'
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9453787Z ##[group]Runner Image Provisioner
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9454728Z Hosted Compute Agent
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9455654Z Version: 20251211.462
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9456607Z Commit: 6cbad8c2bb55d58165063d031ccabf57e2d2db61
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9457699Z Build Date: 2025-12-11T16:28:49Z
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9458457Z Worker ID: {b8ade379-b8c0-48a3-b57b-9afdca28d085}
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9459151Z ##[endgroup]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9459676Z ##[group]Operating System
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9460306Z Ubuntu
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9460739Z 24.04.3
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9461185Z LTS
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9461629Z ##[endgroup]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9462158Z ##[group]Runner Image
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9462646Z Image: ubuntu-24.04
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9463188Z Version: 20251215.174.1
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9464203Z Included Software: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/ubuntu24/20251215.174/images/ubuntu/Ubuntu2404-Readme.md
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9465809Z Image Release: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/releases/tag/ubuntu24%2F20251215.174
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9466889Z ##[endgroup]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9468114Z ##[group]GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9470263Z Contents: read
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9470801Z Metadata: read
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9471278Z ##[endgroup]
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9473384Z Secret source: Actions
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9474441Z Prepare workflow directory
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9799636Z Prepare all required actions
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:30.9837407Z Getting action download info
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3745465Z Download action repository 'actions/checkout@v6' (SHA:8e8c483db84b4bee98b60c0593521ed34d9990e8)
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.4902707Z Download action repository 'astral-sh/setup-uv@85856786d1ce8acfbcc2f13a5f3fbd6b938f9f41' (SHA:85856786d1ce8acfbcc2f13a5f3fbd6b938f9f41)
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:32.0339706Z Download action repository 'actions/setup-python@v5' (SHA:a26af69be951a213d495a4c3e4e4022e16d87065)gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -E "Loading configuration|Loading preset" | head -10
Let me try to see if maybe the preset is being used instead of the config file. Let me check if there's any mention of "dev" preset.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -i preset | head -10
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8295678Z preset
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP ο»Ώ2025-12-31T07:44:31.3945065Z Current runner version: '2.330.0'
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3968325Z ##[group]Runner Image Provisioner
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3969056Z Hosted Compute Agent
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3969583Z Version: 20251211.462
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3970131Z Commit: 6cbad8c2bb55d58165063d031ccabf57e2d2db61
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3971088Z Build Date: 2025-12-11T16:28:49Z
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3971684Z Worker ID: {c0c2e16e-348c-4c1f-9c43-2f7900ed8e43}
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3972292Z ##[endgroup]
Spread (preset-dev) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:31.3972736Z ##[group]Operating Systemgh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep "concierge.*prepare" | head -5
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8288641Z + /root/proj/concierge --trace prepare Spread (provider-none) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:42.3470917Z + /root/proj/concierge --trace prepare
So the command is just /root/proj/concierge --trace prepare with no explicit config file or preset. According to the load_config logic, this should:
1. First check if a preset is specified (it's not)
2. Then check for an explicit config file (it's not)
3. Then check for a default concierge.yaml in the current directory (this should exist in the test directory)
Let me check the config loading log to see if the config file was actually found and loaded.
gh run view 20614632449 --log | awk '/Spread \(disable-juju-config\)/,/grep error: pattern not found/' | grep -E "INFO|DEBUG" | grep -E "config|Config|file" | head -20
Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:44:40.4138896Z GODEBUG='' Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8290357Z [2025-12-31 07:45:56] DEBUG Using selector: selector_events.py:64 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8293102Z INFO Starting environment preparation prepare.py:23 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8294343Z INFO No config file found, using 'dev' loader.py:49 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8297401Z INFO Configuration loaded prepare.py:28 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8304013Z DEBUG Created directory runner.py:257 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8306663Z DEBUG Wrote file runner.py:234 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8310971Z DEBUG Merged runtime configuration saved manager.py:115 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8314912Z DEBUG Installing snap snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8316337Z DEBUG Starting command runner.py:126 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8318328Z [2025-12-31 07:45:57] DEBUG Queried snapd API [classic=True snap.py:57 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8321683Z DEBUG Starting command runner.py:126 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8324905Z [2025-12-31 07:46:01] DEBUG Finished command runner.py:152 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8328229Z INFO Installed snap snap_handler.py:82 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8329810Z DEBUG Installing snap [snap=jq] snap_handler.py:56 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8331048Z DEBUG Queried snapd API [classic=False snap.py:57 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8332448Z DEBUG Starting command runner.py:126 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8334260Z [2025-12-31 07:46:04] DEBUG Finished command runner.py:152 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8335825Z DEBUG Starting command runner.py:126 Spread (disable-juju-config) UNKNOWN STEP 2025-12-31T07:50:53.8338431Z [2025-12-31 07:46:05] DEBUG Finished command runner.py:152
Found it! The critical line is:INFO No config file found, using 'dev' loader.py:49
The config file is NOT being found, and the system is falling back to the 'dev' preset instead! This is the issue. The test has a concierge.yaml file in its directory, but the concierge tool is not finding it.
Let me check the test to see where it runs from and where the config file is.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/tests/disable-juju-config/task.yaml"
} 1βsummary: Run concierge with just a LXD provider with Juju disabled in config
2βsystems:
3β - ubuntu-24.04
4β
5βexecute: |
6β pushd "${SPREAD_PATH}/${SPREAD_TASK}"
7β
8β "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace prepare
9β
10β list="$(snap list lxd)"
11β echo $list | MATCH lxd
12β echo $list | MATCH latest/stable
13β
14β snap list | NOMATCH juju
15β
16βrestore: |
17β if [[ -z "${CI:-}" ]]; then
18β "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace restore
19β fi
20β
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
The test does pushd "${SPREAD_PATH}/${SPREAD_TASK}" which should change to the test directory where the concierge.yaml file is located. Then it runs "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace prepare.
The issue is that after pushd, the current directory is the test directory (e.g., /root/proj/tests/disable-juju-config), so when it runs /root/proj/concierge --trace prepare, the concierge command looks for concierge.yaml in the current directory, which should be the test directory.
But the log says "No config file found". Let me check what the current directory check is in the config loader.
{
"file_path": "/home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/src/concierge/config/loader.py",
"offset": 36,
"limit": 25
} 36β # Load from preset if specified
37β if preset:
38β logger.info("Loading preset", preset=preset)
39β config = get_preset(preset)
40β # Load from explicit config file if specified
41β elif config_file:
42β config = _load_from_file(Path(config_file))
43β # Try to find config file in default location
44β else:
45β default_path = Path("concierge.yaml")
46β if default_path.exists():
47β config = _load_from_file(default_path)
48β else:
49β logger.info("No config file found, using 'dev' preset")
50β config = get_preset("dev")
51β
52β # Apply overrides if provided
53β if overrides:
54β config.overrides = overrides
55β _apply_overrides(config, overrides)
56β
57β return config
58β
59β
60βdef _load_from_file(path: Path) -> ConciergeConfig:
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
The code checks if Path("concierge.yaml").exists(). This should work if the current directory is the test directory after pushd. However, the Python process might not be seeing the correct current directory.
Let me check if the Go version has the same test structure and if it works there. Actually, wait - let me check the spread.yaml to see if there's something special about how the Python concierge is being built/installed that might affect the working directory.
prepare: |
snap refresh --hold
if systemctl is-enabled unattended-upgrades.service; then
systemctl stop unattended-upgrades.service
systemctl mask unattended-upgrades.service
fi
pushd "$SPREAD_PATH"
sudo snap install astral-uv --classic
uv venv
uv pip install -e .
# Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv.
printf '#!/bin/bash\ncd /root/proj\nexec uv run concierge "$@"\n' > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
popdAha! Found the issue! The wrapper script does:```bash
cd /root/proj exec uv run concierge "$@" ```
When the test does pushd "${SPREAD_PATH}/${SPREAD_TASK}" and then runs "$SPREAD_PATH"/concierge --trace prepare, the wrapper script changes directory BACK to /root/proj before running uv run concierge.
This means the current directory when the Python code runs is always /root/proj, not the test directory! So it's looking for /root/proj/concierge.yaml which doesn't exist.
The fix is to remove the cd /root/proj from the wrapper script, or to make the concierge command respect the current working directory of the caller.Let me check what the Go version's wrapper looks like or how it handles this.
6f61cc0 ci: use a different approach to create the wrapper 86dedee ci: add a wrapper for compatibility with the Go concierge
commit 6f61cc0e170a75204026008a7700da25730445aa
Author: Ubuntu User <ubuntu@concierge-py>
Date: Wed Dec 31 14:46:09 2025 +1300
ci: use a different approach to create the wrapper
diff --git a/spread.yaml b/spread.yaml
index 25f1043..d8ffa33 100644
--- a/spread.yaml
+++ b/spread.yaml
@@ -95,11 +95,7 @@ prepare: |
uv pip install -e .
# Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv.
- cat > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge" <<'EOF'
-#!/bin/bash
-cd /root/proj
-exec uv run concierge "$@"
-EOF
+ printf '#!/bin/bash\ncd /root/proj\nexec uv run concierge "$@"\n' > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
popdThis commit just changed from heredoc to printf but kept the cd /root/proj. Let me check the original commit to see if there's a reason for this.
commit 86dedee9255457d1626c6447fd023e49913f123e
Author: Ubuntu User <ubuntu@concierge-py>
Date: Wed Dec 31 14:34:24 2025 +1300
ci: add a wrapper for compatibility with the Go concierge
diff --git a/spread.yaml b/spread.yaml
index 87ca739..25f1043 100644
--- a/spread.yaml
+++ b/spread.yaml
@@ -90,4 +90,16 @@ prepare: |
pushd "$SPREAD_PATH"
sudo snap install astral-uv --classic
-
\ No newline at end of file
+
+ uv venv
+ uv pip install -e .
+
+ # Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv.
+ cat > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge" <<'EOF'
+#!/bin/bash
+cd /root/proj
+exec uv run concierge "$@"
+EOF
+ chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
+
+ popdI see - this wrapper was added to ensure uv run concierge works from the correct project directory where the pyproject.toml is located. But this breaks the assumption that config files should be found relative to the current working directory.The fix is to remove the cd /root/proj and instead rely on the fact that uv run can find the project by looking up the directory tree for pyproject.toml. But I need to verify this works.
Actually, a better approach might be to preserve the current working directory by using an absolute path to the uv/Python installation but not changing the cwd. Let me modify the wrapper to not change directories.
# Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv. printf '#!/bin/bash\ncd /root/proj\nexec uv run concierge "$@"\n' > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge" chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
# Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv. # Use --directory to specify the project root without changing cwd printf '#!/bin/bash\nexec uv run --directory /root/proj concierge "$@"\n' > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge" chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
The file /home/tameyer/code/concierge-py/spread.yaml has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
93β
94β uv venv
95β uv pip install -e .
96β
97β # Create a wrapper script that runs the Python version via uv.
98β # Use --directory to specify the project root without changing cwd
99β printf '#!/bin/bash\nexec uv run --directory /root/proj concierge "$@"\n' > "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
100β chmod +x "$SPREAD_PATH/concierge"
101β
102β popd
103βGood! Now let me commit this fix and have the user push it to trigger a new CI run.
git add spread.yaml && git commit -m "fix: preserve current working directory in wrapper script The wrapper script was changing directory to /root/proj before running concierge, which prevented the tool from finding config files in the current working directory. This caused tests with local concierge.yaml files to fall back to the 'dev' preset instead of using their configs. Changed to use 'uv run --directory /root/proj' which specifies the project root for uv without changing the current working directory, allowing config files to be found relative to where the command is run. π€ Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>"
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
I found the root cause! The wrapper script was changing the current working directory to /root/proj before running the concierge command. This prevented tests from finding their local concierge.yaml config files.
The Problem:
The wrapper script in spread.yaml was:
#!/bin/bash
cd /root/proj
exec uv run concierge "$@"
When a test does pushd to its test directory and runs concierge, the wrapper would cd back to /root/proj, causing the config loader to look for concierge.yaml there instead of in the test directory. Since it wasn't found, it would fall back to the 'dev' preset.
The Fix:
I changed the wrapper to use uv run --directory /root/proj which tells uv where to find the Python project without changing the current working directory:
#!/bin/bash
exec uv run --directory /root/proj concierge "$@"
Now config files will be found relative to where the command is executed (the test directory), not relative to the project root.
Commit: 11d6fbe - fix: preserve current working directory in wrapper script
This should fix all the failing tests that rely on local config files (disable-juju-config, juju-extra-bootstrap-args, juju-model-defaults, overrides-priority, and the provider tests).
Please push with:
git push origin fix-spread-tests
The user has pushed the fix. Let me check the new CI run to see if the wrapper script fix resolved the remaining test failures.
in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration Spread fix-spread-tests pull_request 20617011100 12s 2025-12-31T10:20:17Z in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration GitHub Actions Security Analysis with zizmor π fix-spread-tests pull_request 20617011098 12s 2025-12-31T10:20:17Z in_progress fix: correct the spread configuration CI fix-spread-tests pull_request 20617011097 12s 2025-12-31T10:20:17Z completed success fix: correct the spread configuration PR Title Validation fix-spread-tests pull_request 20617011101 9s 2025-12-31T10:20:17Z completed failure fix: correct the spread configuration CI fix-spread-tests pull_request 20614632441 19s 2025-12-31T07:43:55Z
Command running in background with ID: b63d548. Output is being written to: /tmp/claude/-home-tameyer-code-concierge-py/tasks/b63d548.output
I've started monitoring the CI run in the background. Let me wait for it to complete and then check the results.
The new CI run (ID: 20617011100) is now in progress. I'm monitoring it in the background. This run includes the wrapper script fix that should preserve the current working directory, allowing tests to find their local config files.
The fix should resolve most of the remaining failures:
- disable-juju-config
- juju-extra-bootstrap-args
- juju-model-defaults
- overrides-priority
- provider-google
- provider-k8s
- provider-lxd
- provider-microk8s
- provider-none
I'll let you know once the run completes and we can verify the results.