| Element | Reading |
|---|---|
| seqICP readout profile (forex) | GRADED: n_acc 0 โ 100 feats ยท mid-scale โ 7 ยท full-accept โ 23 (vs the bimodal crypto profile โ the substrate matters) |
| M3 attack | worst |ฯ| = 0.653 (s_max_p vs e-ICP n_acc; positive, as related invariance instruments should be) โ far under the 0.95 kill bar. Crypto M3: 0.252 (row 37). Non-redundant on both substrates. |
| Disagreement structure (the role evidence) | e-ICP-only identifications: 14 features ยท seqICP-only: 3 ยท both: 1 (intra_intensity_qps_q1000 โ seqICP {duration_us, intra_intensity_qps} โ e-ICP {duration_us}; overlapping, e-ICP more specific) |
| Ladder summary | M0/M1 โ (screening + JASA lineage + exam) ยท M2 โ (block-null standing rule) ยท M3 โ (both substrates) ยท M5โฒ โ (entrance exam, row 36) โ the row-34 M3+M5โฒ precedent ยท crypto M4 ran and FAILED โ crypto scope stays EXCLUDED (row 38) |
| Verdict (row 39) | ADMIT(forex, 10-env EURUSD@5 grid, role = env-free corroborating invariance readout โ mechanically independent second opinion at the STABLE boundary, works where env labels are wrong or absent, expiry = next completed forex regime slice) โ ADMIT #5. Feed row H-016 consumed. |
What the stack gains: STABLE claims on forex can now cite two mechanically unrelated invariance instruments (env-labelled e-value fold-products + label-free time-block statistics). Agreement between them is strong evidence; divergence is a flag for regime-definition problems โ a failure mode nothing else in the stack could see.