| Leg | Reading | Ruling |
|---|---|---|
| Part A identification | {duration_us}: e=1.0 (degenerate) + MSE=0.0 โ survives ยท all 4 survivors contain duration ยท weight(duration)=1.0 ยท โ rejected (e=1.4M) | PASS โ perfect separation |
| Part B co-selection (burstiness target) | ZERO surviving teams โ weight gap 0=0 over an empty family | VACUOUS โ recorded, not accepted |
| Part Bโฒ co-selection (intensity_q1000 target, twin pair among predictors) | Family again empty (stable teams not best-predictive; best-predictive teams unstable โ a truth about the data). But swap-symmetric teams scored bit-identically through both screens ({duration_us} โก {intra_duration_us}: e=11.89, MSE=0.953768; supersets 43.53/0.906603) | Co-selection ESTABLISHED (measurement + proof: identical scores โ inseparable in any family) |
| Verdict (row 46) | EXAM PASS โ checkpoint; ladder next with two named fights | |
The two ladder fights, named now: (1) the ฮบ knob โ the predictiveness slack (ฮบ=0.01 exam fixture) demonstrably changes which teams survive; per campaign law (ยง0: magic numbers must be derived or shown insensitive) it must be resolved before any ADMIT; (2) the shared-oracle question โ the stability screen rides the admitted v5 oracle, so the IAS lesson applies: the M3 attack must show the SET-level readout adds information beyond the per-feature instruments.