โ€บNavigation

Iteration 3 โ€” Self-Test Seal 2/4: Noise Gauge Rejected as Dead Weight C2 PASS

What happened in this iteration, in plain words: trick candidate #2. We built a fake instrument that emits pure random numbers โ€” right shape, plausible look, zero information โ€” and submitted it five times (five different random draws, so one lucky draw can't fool us). Each time, the lab measured whether adding the fake to the trusted instrument panel improved its forecasts of "which features stay orthogonal next regime." Verdict all five times: improves nothing โ€” thrown out as dead weight. Crucially, we also proved the test isn't a rubber stamp: a secretly-perfect instrument fed through the same machinery WAS detected as genuinely valuable. And unlike trick #1 (which used a tiny 40-cell artifact), this one ran on the real campaign panel โ€” 2,992 real regime transitions across 21 market/threshold combos, byte-verified to match the numbers of the original frozen campaign. Two tricks down, two to go.

Preflight (A0)

2026-07-03 07:55 UTC โ€” load1 2.49 / 32 cores (โ‰ค24, flat vs load15 3.07) ยท no competing nasimubd jobs ยท 23 GiB available, si/so=0 ยท clickhouse-server active ยท sidecar unit active + /health = healthy โ†’ ALL PASS. Run executed inside the 5-core/5-GB systemd-run scope (operator directive; spikes pre-authorized per 2026-07-03b โ€” no ClickHouse was needed anyway: the real panel is the on-disk ~/tierA_v3/cells cache of the committed campaign).

The trick candidate and how it died

PLANT: "noise gauge" = U(0,1) random output per (cell, feature) โ€” correct shape, zero information
       x 5 independent seeds (a single lucky draw cannot pass)
PANEL: real campaign walk-forward panel, ~/tierA_v3/cells (sha-pinned manifest)
       n = 2,992 crypto transitions ยท 803 among-orthogonal-at-t   โ† replicates the
       committed e123_v3 numbers EXACTLY (2992 / 803) โ€” same data, same label (TAU=0.85)
                       โ”‚
   M3 passthrough check: max|rho|(noise, admitted) โ‰ค 0.110 < 0.95
                       โ”‚   (the plant legitimately reaches M4 โ€” not killed early)
   M4 INCREMENTAL VALUE (the gate that must kill it):
       baseline  = logistic(redundancy, adv_auc, granger_echo_p)   [wold_R suspended]
                   fit on cal epochs (first 60%), applied ONCE to test epochs
                   conditional AUC among orth_t on test: 0.9753 (n=256)
       augmented = baseline + noise column, same protocol
       ฮ”AUC 95% cluster-bootstrap CI (by combo, B=400):
         seed 1  โˆ’0.0112  [โˆ’0.0242, +0.0009]  contains 0 โœ“
         seed 2  โˆ’0.0013  [โˆ’0.0082, +0.0086]  contains 0 โœ“
         seed 3  โˆ’0.0112  [โˆ’0.0272, +0.0023]  contains 0 โœ“
         seed 4  +0.0000  [ 0.0000,  0.0000]  contains 0 โœ“ (degenerate: logistic gave the
                                                noise so little weight the test ranking
                                                never changed โ€” purest dead weight)
         seed 5  โˆ’0.0036  [โˆ’0.0227, +0.0079]  contains 0 โœ“
       shuffled-pairing null (refit per permutation): observed ฮ”AUC inside band, all seeds โœ“
                       โ”‚
   ANTI-VACUITY GUARD (is "CI contains 0" a rubber stamp?):
       planted PERFECT gauge (the true label + eps) through the SAME machinery
       โ†’ ฮ”AUC CI [+0.0008, +0.0512] โ€” entirely > 0 โ†’ machinery CAN reject โœ“
                       โ–ผ
   VERDICT for the plant: EXCLUDE(DEAD-WEIGHT) at M4 โ€” all 5 seeds
   VERDICT for the control: C2 PASS โ€” the incremental-value gate works

Technical record

ItemValue
ControlC2 noise gauge (SELF-TEST-CONTROLS.md) โ€” matched-null anchor; must EXCLUDE at M4 (DEAD-WEIGHT), ฮ”AUC CI must contain 0
Harnessc2_noise_gauge.py (audit folder) โ€” stdlib-only, deterministic; mirrors the frozen e123_v3_walk_forward.py machinery 1:1 (transition construction, TAU=0.85 label, rank AUC, cluster bootstrap by combo B=400, E2-convention temporal 60/40 split)
Panel~/tierA_v3/cells (383 per-cell JSONs, the committed campaign's own compute cache; manifest sha256 2ed074c9โ€ฆ pinned in result). Panel replication verified against two committed invariants: crypto n_transitions 2992 = e123_v3's 2992; among-orth 547+256 = 803 = e123_v3's n_among 803. Committed leakage gate (T1โ€“T4): PASS on record.
Baseline (admitted)logistic over SIGN-adjusted redundancy + adv_auc + granger_echo_p; wold_R excluded (suspended, reported-not-gated per campaign verdict); cal-median imputation, cal standardization, apply-once to test. Conditional AUC 0.9753 (test among-orth, n=256)
LegsL0 guard: committed gate PASS + label-shuffle null straddles 0.5 โœ“ ยท L1 dead-weight: all 5 seeds CI โˆ‹ 0 โœ“ ยท L2 pairing-null: observed inside refit-null band, all seeds โœ“ ยท L3 M3-passthrough: max|ฯ| โ‰ค 0.110 โœ“ ยท L4 anti-vacuity: perfect gauge CI [+0.0008,+0.0512] > 0 โœ“
Honest notes(1) seed 4's degenerate [0,0] CI is the strongest possible dead-weight reading, not a defect โ€” its pairing-null band is non-degenerate, proving the pipeline moves when the pairing moves. (2) L4's lower bound (+0.0008) is thin because the baseline already sits at 0.9753 โ€” headroom to 1.0 is small; the leg still separates signal from noise cleanly. (3) The noise ฮ”AUCs skew slightly negative (noise can only dilute a strong baseline) โ€” "no measurable improvement" holds a fortiori.
Parameter tags (ยง0 guard)TAU=0.85 FROZEN ยท 60/40 split DERIVED (frozen E2) ยท B=400/200 DERIVED (e123_v3) ยท admitted set DERIVED (certified minus suspended) ยท logistic LR/ITERS/L2 MAGIC-NUMBER (fit fixture, plateau-stable) ยท U(0,1)ร—5 seeds STRUCTURAL ยท perfect-gauge ฮต=0.05 MAGIC-NUMBER ยท seed base STRUCTURAL
Ledger row2 (SELF-TEST C2 PASS)
Compute / prod impact~2 min single-core inside the 5c/5G scope ยท zero ClickHouse access ยท zero writes outside the audit folder + dashboard

โ–ถ Next iteration

Iteration 3 ยท 2026-07-03 ยท self-test seal 2/4 ยท real campaign panel, hermetic (no ClickHouse) ยท capped scope ยท read-only ยท append-only