In plain words: the team-judging candidate got the fairest possible trial โ and the trial produced the cleanest kind of kill. First, the tuning-dial worry from last time dissolved: sweeping the dial across its whole sensible range showed the answers barely move (a plateau), and deriving the dial's value from first principles (how noisy the prediction-quality estimate itself is) lands almost exactly on the value the exam had guessed. The dial was innocent. Then came the killer question: does this candidate tell us anything our existing instruments don't? No. Its central reading โ how many feature-teams survive โ moves in near-lockstep (97.7% rank agreement) with the reading of an instrument we already certified. The reason is structural, and we had named it in advance: this candidate's "steadiness" test is literally built on the certified instrument's own engine, so its verdicts are that instrument's shadow. One instrument's shelf space, zero new information: rejected, with the reason on record so nobody re-proposes it unchanged. The queue advances to the next candidate.
Preflight (A0): 2026-07-10 00:25โ00:34 โ load1 2.14โ3.37/32c (โค24) ยท no heavy nasimubd jobs ยท 33 GiB avail, si/so=0 ยท CH active ยท sidecar+kintsugi RESTORED by the operator (~00:07/00:23; kintsugi first pass "no shards found"; the 00:20 heartbeat CRITICAL predates the 00:23 restart) โ GREEN โ the loop un-parks. Firing 39 (row 50) was the pre-registered one-line PARKED checkpoint; this firing is iteration 40. One capped run: 0.98 min, 5 workers, systemd-run --scope 5-core/5-GB/no-swap, readonly=2 loader, watchdog clean (0 trips), permutations of real rows only.
One run, two fights (pre-registered rule in stabreg_kappa_sweep_m3.py)
Key insight that made it cheap: e_total and oos_mse per feature-set are ฮบ-independent โ the knob only enters at survivor selection. So one 130-subject ร 8-set grid computation (identical machinery to the entrance exam, per-fold MSEs retained) supports the entire ฮบ-sweep and the M3 census post-hoc.
Fight
Reading
Ruling
ฮบ knob (ยง0: derive or show insensitive)
Derived ฮบ_D = 0.010364 โ the median (over 130 subjects) of the estimation-noise SE of the best set's fold MSEs. The 0.01 exam fixture sat almost exactly on the derived value. Plateau: adjacent-ฮบ readout Spearman 0.948โ1.0 across the ENTIRE sweep [0 โ 0.5]; local insensitivity at ฮบ_D/2..2ฮบ_D: median ฮn_surv = 0. Not degenerate: trivial-family rate โค 0.846 < 0.95 (at ฮบ_D: 69 empty ยท 38 all-8 ยท 23 non-trivial).
RESOLVED โ dial derived AND shown insensitive; the iter-37 red ink dissolves
EXCLUDE(redundant โ set-level readout repackages e-ICP-fp accepted-set count, ฯ=0.977) โ BONEYARD. Re-proposal admissible only with a stability screen NOT built on the admitted v5 oracle.
WHY THE KILL WAS PREDICTED (iter 37, "shared-oracle question"):
StabReg survivor = passes STABILITY screen AND passes PREDICTIVENESS screen
โโโ the admitted v5 โโโ adds too little independent
fold-product e-value variation at census scale
oracle ITSELF
โ
โผ
count(surviving sets) โ count(e-value-accepted sets) = e-ICP-fp's n_acc โ ฯ = 0.977
โถ Next iteration
Next firing: B-01 advances to H-021 EILLS (environment-invariant linear least squares) โ entrance exam on the byte-identical forex twin anchor per its CANDIDATE-CATALOG dossier (M0/M1 pre-screened by the harvest campaign; M2 risk flags noted there). Cheapest-kill-first; the ground-truth exam is the cheapest kill available. Standing for the operator: the 73 cycle-1 draft statuses (iters 11/13), the Frontier #4 expiry-monitor precondition review, and the ripening STABLE-declaration proposal (five certified forex instruments + validity-clean bedrock + shape-shift warning list).