Iteration 64 — ADMIT #12: the Calibration Gap Meter STRONGEST M4 LIFT OF THE CAMPAIGN

In plain words: the candidate that survived where three whole schools fell finished with the campaign's best result. Plugged into our verdict machinery on strictly held-out later regimes, its confidence-honesty readings improved forecasts by nearly TWICE the previous record — with the entire uncertainty band positive and far beyond anything lucky pairing produces. The era-stability question that executed the gap meter answered itself: a reading whose meaning flips between eras cannot produce an all-positive held-out result, and this one did. Twelfth certificate issued, for a channel nothing else on the shelf reads: does a model's stated confidence stay honest in every regime? One more scientific deposit: for the FOURTH time through a fourth lens, features that look worse by a stability-adjacent measure keep their edge more often — the iteration-9 inverted mechanism is now corroborated four ways, begging for its own dedicated investigation. One candidate pair remains before the batch closes.