In plain words: the third delivery is on the certification lab's shelf โ thirteen more STABLE-boundary instruments, the boundary that decides the project's hardest question ("will this feature still be independent tomorrow?"). The ordering follows the campaign's standing economics: instruments whose papers ship exact statistical guarantees go first (a regularity-free test cheap enough to build in an afternoon leads), the three-piece anchor toolkit travels as a unit, the robustness diagnostics with hand-built trust anchors ride mid-pack, and the two entries carrying known real-data risks go last with those risks named in writing โ one's guarantee assumes independent sampling our markets don't provide, the other struggles on noisy stochastic systems. Every flag from the screening travels with its instrument; the lab starts with our homework, not from scratch. The running total: thirty-three vetted instruments delivered across three batches, every screened queue now empty, and the pipeline turns back to the boundaries still waiting for their first interrogation.
Iteration 13 = EXPIRY screen S-04 (cohort of 10 ready) โ the live-decay monitors face M0/M1: the e-detectors, confidence sequences, conformal test martingales, sequential quantile bands, the changepoint detectors, drift detectors, and adaptive conformal entries. Note: four EXPIRY entries are still provenance-pending from the scaffold (H-011..H-014) โ they cannot be screened and will be named as such; the screenable cohort is the remainder. After S-04: FRAGILEโCOND harvesting (deficit 54 โ family 9 stability indices, family 13 leads, local Gaussian correlation).
Steering point: no directive = EXPIRY screen next firing. Directives are ledger-recorded verbatim before taking effect.
Machine-readable record: ledger row 17 + FRONTIER-FEED.md ยงB-03 + catalog ยงB-03 transitions. WebSearch: blocked this firing (recorded). Pages are append-only.