โ€บNavigation
Dashboard โ€บ Three-Axis Probes

axis 2 ยท static ยท operational

๐Ÿ”ข Parameterless

Does this feature contain secret hand-tuned numbers? "No magic numbers, no tuned constants, no if nโ‰ฅ500 dispatch" (msg 428). FREE โ€” no market data โ€” so it runs first and short-circuits before any ClickHouse cost.

Job 1 โ€” the gate (per candidate)

AST-scan every literal, estimator kwarg and size-dispatch; classify against constants_registry.toml:

classmeaningpromotion
derivedforced by math (log K, ฮพ Varโ†’2/5)PASS
project_wideONE global value for every feature (the _q1000 precedent)PASS
feature_tunablea knob the candidate picked for itselfBLOCKED
inline literal / unregisteredhardcoded order=3 or unknown constantBLOCKED
Worked contrast (real demo): bar_svd_entropy pinned to project-wide SVD_ORDER โ†’ PASS. The same feature in add_antropy hardcoding order=3, delay=1 โ†’ FAIL. Same math, different discipline โ€” the exact near-promotion this prevents.

Job 2 โ€” the promotion sweep (across ALL candidates)

Accumulates every tested candidate's knobs in candidate_knobs.jsonl (append-only). When โ‰ฅ4 candidates across families share the same knob at the same value, that's a convention, not a magic number โ€” promotable to a project-wide constant, rescuing every user at once.

knobverdictmembers / families
ordinal_embedding_m = 3REUSE (ORDINAL_M, #513)9 / 1
ordinal_embedding_tau = 1REUSE (ORDINAL_TAU, #513)9 / 1
mfdfa_detrend_order = 1PROMOTE-NEW16 / 2
takens_embedding_tau = 1PROMOTE-NEW4 / 1
4
promotable now
8
candidates rescued
40
inventory size
PASS
vs manual plan
3-gate promotion bar: (a) identical across โ‰ฅ4 members ยท (b) structural integer, never a tuning float ยท (c) ships with SSoT const + invariant + ban-guard (#513 pattern). Rule: Axis-2-clean + orthogonality PASS โ‡’ promotable now.

Job 3 โ€” inventory triage (every untested candidate, verdict before compute)

--verdicts issues a concrete Axis-2 verdict for EVERY candidate from its declared knob set โ€” no implementation needed. A FAIL goes to the orthogonality-only, no-promotion track (its Axis-2 fate is already known), so promotion compute is never wasted.

1
PASS pending (#18)
0
CONDITIONAL (corrected)
21
FAIL โ€” persisted, no promotion
3
out-of-scope (2nd series)

2026-06-12: the CECP trio came back from the 210-cell orthogonality campaign โ€” #19 CECP velocity PASS (maxโ€–ฯโ€– 0.666 โ†’ PROMOTABLE NOW, implementation loop running) ยท #20 Binary CECP WATCH (0.937) ยท #16 Statistical Complexity BAN (0.969 vs bar_petrosian_fd). 2026-06-12 correction (operator challenge upheld): the 8 MF-DFA "CONDITIONAL" verdicts were under-declared โ€” formula research shows 8โ€“16+ handpicked knobs each (q-grid, scale schedule, fit range + variant machinery) โ†’ all 8 corrected to FAIL; a fail-closed family-manifest completeness gate now blocks under-declared rows. Evidence: parameterless_inventory_verdicts.json + the 2026-06-10 campaign spoke.

Deep dives: AXIS-2-PARAMETERLESS.md ยท AXIS-2-PROMOTION-SWEEP.md