### ftl_project_expert/cli.py:_load_env_file
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: QUESTIONABLE
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Two edge-case bugs:

1. **No `export` prefix handling.** Many `.env` files use `export FOO=bar`. `line.partition("=")` yields key `"export FOO"`, which sets a bogus env var instead of `FOO`. Most env-file loaders strip a leading `export `.

2. **`strip("'\"")`  strips mismatched quotes.** `value.strip().strip("'\"")` removes any leading/trailing chars in the set `{'`, `"}`, independently. So `"hello'` becomes `hello` — both quotes stripped even though they don't match. A matched-pair check (only strip if first and last are the same quote char) would be more correct.

Neither is likely to cause a production incident with typical `.env` files, but both are easy to hit and easy to fix. No tests exist for this function or for the CLI group at all (`test_count: 0`), so there's nothing guarding against regressions.

The integration itself is clean: the Click option wires through correctly, `_load_env_file` is called before `ctx.obj` setup (so env vars are available to subcommands), and `FileNotFoundError` is properly swallowed for the default `.env` path.

---

### ftl_project_expert/cli.py:cli
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: The Click option addition and parameter threading are correct. `env_file` is passed through and consumed immediately. Calling `_load_env_file` before `ctx.ensure_object(dict)` is fine — the function only touches `os.environ`, not the Click context. The `default=".env"` with silent `FileNotFoundError` means existing users are unaffected.

---

### SELF_REVIEW
LIMITATIONS: No test files were available to review (none exist). Could not verify whether any downstream subcommands rely on env vars in ways that might interact poorly with the load timing. Did not have the commit message or issue to understand the full motivation for the feature.

---

### FEATURE_REQUESTS
- Include the commit message body (not just the subject) in the review context — it often explains design decisions and known limitations.
- When `test_count: 0`, flag it prominently at the top of the observation results so the reviewer doesn't have to search for it.

---
