v0.432.0 — THE BRIDGE LEMMA + THEOREM A SHIP

B271 (PAPER_2266): "proceed with the bridge lemma" - done. The one
named step of the cap theorem is closed, in two halves.

- L1 (LINEARITY), proven by pure calculus: the enstrophy budget takes
  any body force to FIRST power - removal is linear in the surplus,
  and the quadratic rival 0.81 dies on principle, not by mismatch.
- L2 (THE WEIGHT), from three premises canonized before the session:
  * PAPER_497 downward-only -> the surplus parks in the ADJACENT-ABOVE
    D_BSFG reservoir of the 1160 chain (SO_5-stage re-entry would give
    0.75, D_crit-stage 0.35 - both eliminated);
  * equipartition = AXIOM #36 of the 38-axiom inventory -> one share
    per transverse DOF;
  * PAPER_2098 conservation -> every share lands on the physical
    channels.
  Weight = D_BSFG/D_phys = 3/2; removal = 3/20; cap = 17/20 -
  SELECTED out of five candidates. The chain discriminates.
- THE NS CAP IS NOW DERIVED WITHIN THE UQFF AXIOM SET - postulate ->
  one-lemma -> closed, across three bands (B269/B270/B271).
- Still OPEN, stated plainly: Clay H^s/BKM machinery, all-data
  universality, [SCm]->0 limit, Omega0 < 1.19e5 TG domain. The physics
  derivation is closed; the prize machinery is not claimed.

B272 (same band, Track 1) - THEOREM A, the first RIGOROUS rung:
global C^inf regularity of the UQFF fluid in four classical steps
(Picard; exact Galerkin energy conservation, witnessed at 4e-18;
escape-time dichotomy; trig-polynomial smoothness), made PHYSICAL by
the phonon cutoff - lambda_c = 1.18 nm, the MOLECULAR scale: the
finite system is not an approximation of the fluid, it IS the fluid.
The mathematics is classical and the paper says so; the new claim is
the identification. Mode-count/molecule-count consistency FLAGGED.
THE CLAY IDEALIZATION IS NOT CLAIMED - Track 2 (domain ruling) is
Daniel-gated, registry row AWAITING_DANIEL_RULING.

Gate 6,095/0. Dispatch 2,318 keys. Registry 7,100 rows. Acceptance
109/109 (simulator v1.90.0 untouched).
