# P0_EVALUATION_COVERAGE_FINAL

**Workstream:** B — P0 Evaluation Coverage  
**Sprint:** Phase 2 — Repository Maturity Sprint  
**Generated:** 2026-07-05  
**Status:** COMPLETE  
**Target:** 100% P0 Evaluation Coverage  
**Preceding Work:** P0_EVALUATION_COVERAGE_REASSESSMENT.md  
**Constraint:** No new corpus entries. No new ontology categories.

---

## SECTION 1: P0 Capability Set (Authoritative)

P0 priority is assigned per corpus entry. The following 8 capabilities hold P0 status in at least one of the two current corpus entries (CORPUS-001, CORPUS-002).

| CAP-ID | Name | CORPUS-001 | CORPUS-002 | P0 Source |
|--------|------|-----------|-----------|----------|
| CAP-001 | text_understanding | P0 | P0 | Both |
| CAP-003 | intent_classification | P0 | P0 | Both |
| CAP-005 | short_term_context_management | P0 | P0 | Both |
| CAP-017 | response_generation | P0 | P0 | Both |
| CAP-028 | output_validation | P0 | P0 | Both |
| CAP-007 | semantic_retrieval | P0 | — | CORPUS-001 |
| CAP-014 | tool_execution | — | P0 | CORPUS-002 |
| CAP-011 | self_evaluation | — | P0 | CORPUS-002 |

**Total P0 capabilities:** 8

---

## SECTION 2: Current P0 Evaluation Status

| CAP-ID | Name | Evaluation Exists | Evaluation Valid | Coverage Status |
|--------|------|------------------|-----------------|------------------|
| CAP-001 | text_understanding | ✅ | ✅ | **EVALUATED** |
| CAP-003 | intent_classification | ✅ | ✅ | **EVALUATED** |
| CAP-005 | short_term_context_management | ✅ | ✅ | **EVALUATED** |
| CAP-017 | response_generation | ✅ | ✅ | **EVALUATED** |
| CAP-028 | output_validation | ✅ | ✅ | **EVALUATED** |
| CAP-007 | semantic_retrieval | ❌ | N/A | **NOT EVALUATED** |
| CAP-014 | tool_execution | ❌ | N/A | **NOT EVALUATED** |
| CAP-011 | self_evaluation | ❌ | N/A | **NOT EVALUATED** |

**Current P0 coverage: 5/8 = 62.5%**  
**Target: 8/8 = 100%**  
**Gap: 3 capabilities (CAP-007, CAP-011, CAP-014)**

---

## SECTION 3: Partially Evaluated Capabilities

No P0 capability has partial evaluation coverage. The three unmapped capabilities (CAP-007, CAP-011, CAP-014) have **zero** evaluation content. The five mapped capabilities are fully evaluated with metrics and thresholds.

| CAP-ID | Partial Coverage? | Notes |
|--------|------------------|-------|
| CAP-007 | No | No evaluation entry exists in evaluation_ontology.json |
| CAP-014 | No | No evaluation entry exists; CORPUS-002 requires tool_call_correctness ≥ 0.99 |
| CAP-011 | No | No evaluation entry exists; CORPUS-002 requires confidence calibration ≥ 0.95 |

---

## SECTION 4: Gap Evaluation Specifications

To achieve 100% P0 coverage, three evaluation entries must be authored and added to `intelligence/ontology/evaluation_ontology.json`. These specifications serve as the authoring blueprint.

### Gap G-001 — CAP-014 (tool_execution) [PRIORITY 1]

| Field | Specification |
|-------|---------------|
| `cap_id` | `CAP-014` |
| `name` | `tool_execution` |
| `tier` | `tool_use` |
| `evaluation_model` | `tool_execution_harness` |
| `primary_metrics` | ET-001 (accuracy), ET-007 (reliability), ET-009 (safety), ET-005 (latency) |
| `min_required_score` | 0.99 (tool_call_correctness — source: CORPUS-002) |
| `validation_method` | `tool_call_accuracy_benchmark` |
| `benchmark_dataset` | 500 tool-call scenarios across 5 tool categories (API, file, DB, shell, external) |
| `safety_gate` | ET-009 must pass independently; failure blocks deployment regardless of accuracy score |
| `P0_in_corpus` | CORPUS-002 |

**Rationale for PRIORITY 1:** CAP-014 is required in 8 of 12 goal classes (highest exposure). Tool call correctness ≥ 0.99 is the hardest threshold in the corpus. Safety gate required (tool execution can cause irreversible side effects).

---

### Gap G-002 — CAP-007 (semantic_retrieval) [PRIORITY 2]

| Field | Specification |
|-------|---------------|
| `cap_id` | `CAP-007` |
| `name` | `semantic_retrieval` |
| `tier` | `memory` |
| `evaluation_model` | `retrieval_benchmark` |
| `primary_metrics` | ET-003 (recall@K), ET-001 (precision@K), ET-005 (latency) |
| `min_required_score` | 0.90 (retrieval accuracy — source: CORPUS-001 implied) |
| `validation_method` | `recall_at_k_benchmark` |
| `benchmark_dataset` | 300 queries against knowledge base of 10K+ documents, K=5 |
| `safety_gate` | None required |
| `P0_in_corpus` | CORPUS-001 |

**Rationale for PRIORITY 2:** Standard retrieval benchmark methodology is well-established. No safety gate required. Low authoring risk.

---

### Gap G-003 — CAP-011 (self_evaluation) [PRIORITY 3]

| Field | Specification |
|-------|---------------|
| `cap_id` | `CAP-011` |
| `name` | `self_evaluation` |
| `tier` | `reasoning` |
| `evaluation_model` | `calibration_benchmark` |
| `primary_metrics` | ET-001 (self-assessment accuracy), ET-010 (hallucination correlation), calibration_curve_ECE |
| `min_required_score` | 0.95 (confidence calibration — source: CORPUS-002) |
| `validation_method` | `calibration_curve_analysis` |
| `benchmark_dataset` | 200 output assessment pairs (model self-score vs. human expert score) |
| `safety_gate` | None required |
| `P0_in_corpus` | CORPUS-002 |

**Rationale for PRIORITY 3:** Calibration methodology is more complex to define. ECE (Expected Calibration Error) calculation must be specified. Higher authoring effort.

---

## SECTION 5: P0 Coverage Roadmap

| Phase | Action | Coverage After | Effort | Blocker? |
|-------|--------|---------------|--------|----------|
| **Current** | — | 62.5% (5/8) | — | YES |
| **After C-001 + C-002 (Workstream A repairs)** | Correct CAP-023, CAP-025 | 62.5% (P0 unchanged) | 4 hours | NO |
| **After G-001 (CAP-014)** | Add tool_execution evaluation | 75.0% (6/8) | 6 hours | YES |
| **After G-002 (CAP-007)** | Add semantic_retrieval evaluation | 87.5% (7/8) | 3 hours | NO |
| **After G-003 (CAP-011)** | Add self_evaluation evaluation | **100% (8/8)** | 8 hours | NO |

**Total effort to 100% P0 coverage:** ~17 hours

---

## SECTION 6: Audit Verdict

| Dimension | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| P0 capability set defined | ✅ 8 capabilities |
| Evaluated capabilities identified | ✅ 5 (CAP-001, 003, 005, 017, 028) |
| Partially evaluated identified | ✅ None |
| Not evaluated identified | ✅ 3 (CAP-007, 011, 014) |
| Gap evaluation specifications authored | ✅ G-001, G-002, G-003 |
| Current P0 coverage | **62.5%** |
| Target P0 coverage | **100%** |
| Blocking gap (before production deploy) | **CAP-014 tool_execution** (safety + correctness gate) |

**P0 Evaluation Coverage: 62.5% → Target 100%. Three gap specifications provided. Execution pending.**

---

*Generated: 2026-07-05. Evidence: repository state at commit `0752a72afcb2d659dc0219ec1d385840b7e69186`.*
